-
I have a Godin Montreal as my main guitar. I have been concidering getting an archtop for some time, feeling that I m getting close to some sort of decision. I have been out and tried several jazz boxes that are here in Stockholm to be tried, though that is not my question. Rather, is there a difference other than pure personal estetics when chosing between a Venetian or a Florentine body? Would one be easier to play high up, or suit a hand size better than the other model, is the sound affected in any way? I ask so as to better be aware of the difference when trial playing, to make a better decision. Thanks, and Glad Midsommar!
-
06-19-2015 04:14 AM
-
I think the generally accepted opinion is that the Florentine theoretically offers better upper fret access, being a deeper cutaway.
Personally, I feel the difference is mainly visual.
-
Both of course!!!
-
having tried both I prefer flornetian.
-
Florentine x 2!
Actually, could Ibanez have made that work with a Venetian on top? Or is that crazy talk?
-
I prefer Venetian for looks, but my Slaman avatar is Florentine - c'est la vie! Not detected any difference soundwise.
-
venetian
its feng shui innit ....
i prefer rounded bodies to pointy bodies
ooooooh !
-
The pointy one.
-
I have a Venetian cutaway guitar and find myself with Florentine envy. My hand is big and my access to the upper register is restricted.
-
Florentine, almost always...
The exception is on an L5. Just don't look right.
-
Venetian for me.
-
Originally Posted by SamBooka
-
Florentine works better. Venetian looks cooler, sometimes.
-
I definitely prefer Venetian on a 17 inches bout Gibson style, but on a 16 inches bout like the 175, a florentian is quite right...I guess my cosmetic expectations might play a huge role
-
One can't assume that all Venetians and Florentines are dimentionally or symmetrically identical to each builder.
Last edited by Patrick2; 06-19-2015 at 09:50 PM. Reason: goofy grammar
-
Whichever one has a carved top, low action and is in Mint Condition. No Bigsby please..
-
Kenny Burrell weighs in on the topic below, courtesy of "Vintage Guitar Magazine", and Wolf Marshall:
"Earlier, you had a Gibson ES-175 and then a custom L-5 CES with a Florentine cutaway. That was years before the Florentine cutaway on the L-5 and Super 400. How did it come about?
Gibson made me an L-5 with a deep cutaway in the late ’50s. They did it reluctantly. I played that guitar for a while, but it was too heavy. It had a much bigger block; they thought the body wouldn’t hold the neck with the deep cutaway otherwise. The 175 was too small and always felt clumsy; I couldn’t grab it comfortably with my arm. The Super 400 feels perfect for me."
Kenny Burrell |
-
Originally Posted by helios
-
I wonder about the history of the designation 'Venetian' and 'Florentine'. Wikipedia says
"The terms probably originate with the Gibson Guitar Corporation and probably do not reflect historic instrument-making practices of Florence and Venice"
Does anybody know more about where the terms come from?
-
The Venetian Cutaway on my Guild Benedetto Artist Award is deeper then the Venetian Cutaway on my Gibson L-5, Gibson Super 400 or my 1971 Guild Artist Award.
Here is a picture of the two AA's with the Super 400. You can see the differences.:
As Patrick says, they vary.
I prefer the look of the Venetian, but a 175 needs a Florentine. Putting a Venetian on a 175 would be...blasphemy!Last edited by Stringswinger; 06-19-2015 at 02:20 PM.
-
Originally Posted by Drifter
I like Florence much better than Venice. But I prefer Venetian cutaways fret access notwithstanding. Or like this
-
The names are just Gibson marketing speak.
I like mine either way:
Danny W.
-
And then there are the hybrids. Flornetian? Venentine?
-
it's not florentine unless it comes to a point.
-
Is there a name for cutaways like this? I've only seem them on acoustic guitars.
Critic my Jazz Improvisation Solo practice
Today, 02:43 AM in Improvisation