-
And back to the OP.... Have you watched this YouTube video. Lage is playing his Nachocaster and talks about the guitar at around 19:30.
-
10-05-2020 10:40 PM
-
I like the looks of the new Tele Ultra but I’m hooked on my $750 FSR.
Whatever it takes to get that little surge of dopamine.
-
For those who buy these objects that are expensive. Let me ask you first are you a gigging musician? If not how would you know the difference between $600 Tele and a $6000 Tele?
Fine to support individual luthiers ,etc. But let's call it for what it really is.
Bragging Rights! I get really tired of people who have little time in the saddle telling us how great their gear is, when they are amateurs who really can't play very well.
I'm all for great gear, but even professional race car drivers drive a sedan in their off time.
-
Originally Posted by Stefan Eff
At least there is the one reply that includes Julian talking about that guitar.
As to whether a $6000 Tele plays or sounds better than a $600 one, presumably Julian think so or he would play with/tour with a less expensive instrument.
-
Very interesting answers...
Again, I was only looking for some details about this guitar, just for inspiration.
Tbh, I'm very picky about Tellys, that's why I'm doin' my own stuff
Nachocasters:
Nacho builds (better: assembles) guitars as close as possible to the old originals. But Nachos are Partscasters- the bodys and the necks are made by Musikraft. It's all about the finish on his guitars. I guess he's doin' a great job making those replicas and they sound really good. Dunno if they're worth 6k and I highly doubt Julian pays that much for his one.
Concerning prices:
Only parts and finish of my Thinline are all in all 2.5k (talking €). I've invested 80 hrs of work on this guitar. What is it worth?
-
-
-
Originally Posted by Cunamara
-
So... speaking of "50's teles" and clones thereof.....the "blackguards" specifically... from what I have read, the thing that makes them sound a little different from other teles is they all had A3 magnets in the pickups instead of the later A5. A3 has more mids, is a little less bright.
Duke Levine owns an actual '53, but then bought a "53 relic", and he says it's pretty darned close to the original.... he talks about it in this video (ffwd to 38:00 for the gear talk)
And... while I said I don't think I could ever pay 6K for a guitar.... I guess I'll amend that statement to "if I had ONE guitar, and that guitar was "The One To Rule Them All", and I knew it would be my keeper for life (and again, my only guitar)... I'd pay 6K. The catch is: I wouldn't know any of that until I had owned it awhile and bonded with it, so...Last edited by ruger9; 10-06-2020 at 07:27 AM.
-
Originally Posted by Litterick
-
Originally Posted by Litterick
Was actually about to make this same comment, as Julian has a '50's tele...and it's worth a lot more than 6k.
-
Originally Posted by jads57
-
It‘s by far not only the pickups.
It‘s old and very dry wood, it‘s the (absence) of nitro lacquer, thousands of playing hours and so on. Was it Alnico3? Alnico2? Magnets also age with time and back in the day Leo used what he can get for the best price afaik.
And I guess today you‘re able to build a Blackguard replica that looks and sounds like an old one but plays better. Those old Tellys are perfectly analyzed. But you won‘t get look, feel and tone from an industrial made Telecaster. Nvrevr.
Here‘s my current project, a 52 inspired Esquire:
(don‘t know how to turn the picture, sry)
A super resonant swamp ash body, 4.75 lbs, thin nitro coat. This guy sounds awesome for sure!Last edited by Stefan Eff; 10-06-2020 at 09:53 AM.
-
As far as amateur and professional. This is probably the only field of endevour that amateurs can get away with pretending their in the professionals league.
Can't imagine any such behaviour in sports,law,medicine,etc.
Again not against amateur musicians, just the ones who act like experts. And also not against great gear either, but the wand doesn't make the magician!
-
Originally Posted by jads57
-
Originally Posted by jads57
-
Originally Posted by mr. beaumont
-
The point is when buying a $6k guitar that's made from fairly common woods and inexpensive parts. What exactly are you paying for from a usable tool perspective?
When I bought a 1958 Gibson Les Paul Gold top from Gruhns Guitars in 1975 I paid $1400 which was a lot of money at that time. But there werent that many produced and Gibson wasnt offering a newer replica
Now that there are a plethora of used Gibson Historics there's no need to pay exorbitant amounts of money for one.
This is the same with Fender Black guard Teles. So what is it your getting that's extra? It seems as though we've lost track of the music and are more centered on expensive acquisitions.
I personally find it funny that people collect guitars like baseball cards. Unless you actually use it play music with, what's the point
Would you buy a gold plated screwdriver LOL!
-
I for one am happy that there's people that tell me the correct way to enjoy owning guitars.
-
Originally Posted by customxke
-
Originally Posted by stefan eff
-
Not the owning it that bothers me. It's the inference that I'm Cool or in the In Crowd so to speak. Just like High School, and being the rich kid who got a Corvette for his birthday!
No doubt owning a Corvette is cool, but knowing how to drive it is infinitely Cooler
-
Originally Posted by jads57
The aging process is very time consuming. If it’s done professional and authentic very very time consuming. Compare a Fender CS to an MB. Also pricewise...
Good parts are everything but inexpensive. That’s totally BS.
Same for wood. Swamp Ash? Check Fender! Pickups? Saddles? Bridgeplates?
You can buy a new Squier Telly for ~190€.
Go ahead!
And you owe me an answer (see above).Last edited by Stefan Eff; 10-07-2020 at 05:21 AM.
-
Originally Posted by lammie200
-
BTW, beautiful work, Stefan.
“Four”
Today, 09:59 AM in The Songs