-
Mr B: Is this ok for a "heads-up" for your new sticky thread?
Ok all, anticipating the poll winner will be "Cry Me A River", the links below are:
1) a pdf lead sheet Cry Me A River.pdf - File Shared from Box.net - Free Online File Storage
2) a realtracks BIAB backing track in a Bill Evans Trio style. This is for 4 choruses, a 4 bar intro and a 4 bar tag ending. Just for fun, when you use this a a backing file, imagine yourself to be in a small club playing dinner music. Have fun! Box
wizLast edited by wizard3739; 08-15-2011 at 08:31 PM.
-
08-09-2011 03:22 PM
-
Here is a chord analysis.
The chord progression is the same as the one in the Real Book III. The Roman Numerals above the staff analyze every chord. The Roman Numerals below the staff are a simplified analysis (my guitar teacher use to say, "Think simple, play fancy).
Let me know if I made any mistakes or if you would analyze this differently. Do you have any insights? I'm hoping we can have a discussion on this.
Note, I did this with the free notation software 'MuseScore'. I'm very pleased with this software.
Here's a link to a .pdf of that analysis:
BoxLast edited by Dirk; 04-20-2018 at 07:08 AM.
-
Hey Frank, good analysis! I need to start using musescore. My feeble analysis and my ear tells me the song is mostly in c minor so when I improvise on it I try to play around with the melody and use some minor sounds/arps.
wizLast edited by wizard3739; 08-09-2011 at 05:30 PM.
-
Originally Posted by wizard3739
Oops I see a mistake on my part, I was thinking A7#9 on the first measure of the 5th system but it's a Ab7#9, a tritone sub of the D7 chord or a bII7/G7 approach chord, either way it's a dominant function to the G& chord. I'll fix that later.
Edit, Corrections have been made in previous post.Last edited by fep; 08-09-2011 at 06:17 PM.
-
The chord progression is the same as the one in the Real Book III. The Roman Numerals above the staff analyze every chord. The Roman Numerals below the staff are a simplified analysis (my guitar teacher use to say, "Think simple, play fancy).
Let me know if I made any mistakes or if you would analyze this differently. Do you have any insights? I'm hoping we can have a discussion on this.
Note, I did this with the free notation software 'MuseScore'. I'm very pleased with this software.
-
Little known fact that this song has origins that run back to the late Romantic era and Peter Tchaikovsky. Tchaikovsky embarked on a programatic piece describing a battle that would later become his famous 1812 overture.
In its early incarnations though, it was a more modest work, and early versions in song form describe a military conflict called the Crimean war. It took place along a river of the same name. The piece was called Crimea River.
DavidLast edited by TH; 08-11-2011 at 06:49 AM.
-
Originally Posted by TruthHertz
good!
-
Thought I'd share this unique version.
-
Nice! Classic Beck. It reminds me of his Roy Buchanan tribute on Blow by Blow album. (forget the track ... maybe "once we ended as lovers" ??). I would have been a great tune for Buchanan.
-
Thanks for the analysis Fep. Is it okay to ask a few newbie questions? Could you explain the V/V, V/VI and V/II in your "simplified" line?
Also, when I hear people talking about "playing the changes", would sticking to that simplified line be okay? It seems that changing scales with every single chord on the top line would be awfully complicated, at least for someone like me.
FWIW, I'm doing better learning this one than I have with the previous 2 tunes. I'm more familiar with the tune and at least I have the melody under my fingers.
Thanks again...
-
Jazzaluk, the song was 'Cause We've Ended As Lovers
-
Originally Posted by morroben
V/V is pronounced as "five of five". In this case we are in the key of Eb and the V chord is a Bb7 (or Bb9 or Bbsus7). The diatonic II chord would be a IIm so in Eb the diatonic II chord would be an Fm or Fm7. But, in m.8 we don't see the Fm, we see F9 which is a dominant chord and includes the A-natural note that is not in the key of Eb. Most importantly this chord is acting as a dominant chord of the Bb9 chord. Thus the description V/V or Five of Five.
And yes you could play over the simplified changes and you would still be "playing the changes".
-
That is a great song.
is the classic version for jazz guitarists I guess (with Barney K doing some really beautiful comping). There is even a thread on that version somewhere on this forum with a link to a transcription. This tune is also a lot easier (for me) than the last two. When trying to learn the melody, I noticed a couple of notes that sounded odd (to my crap ears) from the leadsheet that Howie posted. It turns out there is a lot of variation between fake books for this tune. e.g. in measure 1 of the melody (under C-7) the note Ab is sometimes notated as a G and in measure 3, the second Bb is a C and that sounds like what Julie London sings although either sound ok when played on the guitar. Thanks again for the work folks.
Des
-
I gave it a try.
Enjoy, or not:
02 Cry Me A River.mp3 - File Shared from Box.net - Free Online File Storage
-
Originally Posted by Kman
-
Hi fellow fans. I too, love Barney's playing and as others have correctly noted, his comping on Julie London's version of, "Cry Me A River" (check it out on Youtube) is superb. AnAustralian gentleman, Doug Khan, has provided a transcription of Barney's comping It can be viewed below. Happy struggles !
-
Originally Posted by gtrplrfla
Cry me a River
There are 2 or 3 really good youtube vids of people playing it also.
-
very nice Kman! Laid back with really nice lines. I loved it.
wiz
-
This my version of improv on "Cry Me A River" in C minor. I was concentrating on playing around with the melody line along with a lot of arpeggios. All comments will be much appreciated.
Cry Me A River.mp3 - File Shared from Box.net - Free Online File Storage
wiz
-
Originally Posted by wizard3739
-
Thanks Dazz, I listened to Julie and Barney a lot when her record came out and have always been intrigued by Barneys' intro. I have a good transcription of it but never really tried to use the intro.
wiz
-
@Wiz, must say you have these ballads off to a tee Howie, sounds cool as always.
@Kman, nice smooth lines and some cool ideas as well Kman very nice.
Well as one or two of you know my guitar playing is on hold for a while, until I get my fingers sorted, so as a to still have some input to this thread I thought i would post this
ArghhI know its a sax, it's just something for a change
2nd time round is a new melody that I came up with. Any way hope you like it and if anyone wants a copy the 2nd verse then let me know and i will try and sort one out.
TomLast edited by oilywrag; 02-20-2012 at 03:33 PM.
-
@kman and wiz - it's great to hear such lovely jazz from good 'normal' guys - inspirational! Can't wait to get back to doing some attempts myself...
@Tom - It's really amazing how much you've learned in just a few months - that's also inspirational!
Great work guys.
-
Originally Posted by fep
You're the educated one so I guess you have your reasons. Please let me know.
-
I think he meant either bVI7 or as you said, tri-tone sub of F9, or simply subV of Bb7. There are always different analysis, depending on how or what approach you use, (tonal references). For example if you choose to call B7 a bVI7, you would be referencing Eb as Imaj and using modal interchange for source of bVI, as compared to using a non tonal center referencing method of calling B7 a tri tone sub of F9 or sub V of Bb7sus. Doesn't make a whole lot of difference in first level of improve... but does have differences when you begin to imply different harmonic concepts down the line. Most never really ever get to those levels of playing or composing... so who really cares...Reg
Last edited by Reg; 08-23-2011 at 03:22 PM.
pre-war CC blade pickup bobbin dimensions
Today, 01:33 PM in Guitar, Amps & Gizmos