-
I was wrong! It’s a sequence :-)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
05-31-2024 11:13 AM
-
Yeah the part writing rules are so riddled with exceptions that they aren’t really useful as rules beyond classrooms.
I think they all boil down to The Voices Must Sound Independent.
Parallel fifths just tend to start sounding like a more homophonic and less independent texture. Etc. overused they sound kind of weird, but in practice they’re all over the place in chorale style music.
I think the problem is just that tritones are very distinctive intervals, so the ear just jumps to that part and it dominates the others a bit. But someone like Bach is always going to be able to use that sound in an artful way that doesn’t draw from the other voices. Or maybe that draws attention from the other voices at a strategic time.
Anyway —- seems weird to have to say this, but art is of course an art, not a science
-
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
-
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
I think they all boil down to The Voices Must Sound Independent.
Parallel fifths just tend to start sounding like a more homophonic and less independent texture. Etc. overused they sound kind of weird, but in practice they’re all over the place in chorale style music.
I think the problem is just that tritones are very distinctive intervals, so the ear just jumps to that part and it dominates the others a bit. But someone like Bach is always going to be able to use that sound in an artful way that doesn’t draw from the other voices. Or maybe that draws attention from the other voices at a strategic time.
Anyway —- seems weird to have to say this, but art is of course an art, not a science
Here the soloist and bass are basically in unison, so it’s not quite the same.
Having the tritone in both voices is interesting, but I don’t think I know enough Bach to comment on how common or uncommon they are. I would expect him to use them more than most - it seems like a Bach sound to me. But I don’t really know tbh. I’ll see if I can spot any examples from now on….
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Tritones were introduced progressively first in measure 5 as the lone tritone C# - G.
Then measure 6 revealed two pairs of tritones, familiar C# - G and the new E - Bb.
Diminished can't produce more tritones without projecting outside themselves.
One way is to project voice motion as in the lead-in tritone moves into measure 9.
Projecting that motion in opposed directions is wonderful and dramatic.
Notice that the preceding two plain Jane measures of Dm crescendo up to mf for the beginning of measure 9, then the notes of measure 9 decrescendo fully back within that measure.
-
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
Originally Posted by ragman1
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
I see it's more about the sound of two simultaneous notes a tritone apart, but it's really interesting, thanks.
-
I’ve been playing around with that little Dm/A G#o7 move with the tritones in the outer voices and I have to say it does sound very Bachian specifically to my ears.
@Alez yes then ascending melodic minor is used as a dominant. Very common in Bach but also I noticed it in a David Kellner lute piece (Kellner being a Leipzig contemporary of JS) so presumably not uncommon. Not sure about Italian baroque music etc. I think it’s regarded as a bit of a Bach thing?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Originally Posted by alez
To me it is typical Bachian mergence of time and space: 8-9 bars concentrate more harmonic information than we just see in the text.
That 'b natural' belongs both to 8th bar as a continuation of a melodic run (which outlines harmony) ... it is like reaching out a bit further (going beyond, going higher (for Bach it is litterally higher!) than one might expect. Like at the end of the phrase the harmonic inertion is overcome and a breakthrough into a new space is made.
But this also gives the feeling that this B nat belongs yet to the harmony of the previous bar. Space belongs here to ii7
But time puts G# here and establishes another harmony.
So this ii7 is both there and not there.
Then in the left hand there is an 'a-a-a-g#' as a hidden voice. It is very strong and it hides a triton jump, softens it a lot.
All together it makes much less straightforward than it may seem if we just play it as two purely melodic lines.
Though overall it is still quite forced modulation in character, I agree, though it is also quite sophisticated.
-
Yes, that’s what I thought - if I was doing something like this in my pedestrian baby’s first baroque harmony sort of way, I’d have out the B in the previous bar. Oh, Dm to Dm6 becomes the iv6/5 (or inverted ii7) of Am, and duly prepared we move to the G# diminished seventh. Smooth and natural and also utterly routine.
It’s withholding creates a different effect.
It sounds and feels distinctly Bachian. It’s something he does a lot I suppose, in different ways, withholding things….
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
but right hand is different.
So it makes right and left hands elements in 8-9 bars also kind of retrospectively separated.
It is also very Bachian: time stops, or time moves the other around.
and also left hand goes on the same texture ( but harmony changes) but right hand goes it’s own way … so many things in a few bars!
With Bach it is especially strong feeling that you see clearly written out notes which seem quite straight but it sounds like much more things are happening there and all together and separately at the same time.
whenever we analyse it we see only one side, then the other etc
but when it is played well they are all there at the sameLast edited by Jonah; 06-02-2024 at 07:32 PM.
Raney and Abersold, great interview.
Yesterday, 11:21 PM in Improvisation