-
I'm looking at these changes:
C | % | % | G7 |
% | Dm7 | G7 | C |
C7 | Bb7 | A7 | Dm7 |
Dm7 Bb7 | Em7 A7 | Dm7 G7 | C ||
(The tune is normally played in the key of F but I've transposed it because I think C helps discussing it.)
The C7 Bb7 A7 catches my attention. My thoughts so far:
1. C7 A7 form a II-V (in this case it's even followed by its I), so you kind of go somewhere else briefly (Bb7), then resume the usual voice leading. Specifically, I'm talking about the voice leading in the notes E F E and G Ab G.
2. If you replaced the one measure long Bb7 with a II-V (Fm7 Bb7, half measure each), you'd get a "logical" movement in fourths. But, unlike the original Bb7, that doesn't work, I think. I feel like it disturbs both the harmonic rhythm and the character of the all-dominants sequence. Also Fm7 is unusual (Berklee even disregards it sort of, together with other IIs, but I'll leave it there because you don't like Berklee LOL).
Thoughts?Last edited by alez; 06-08-2024 at 04:44 PM.
-
06-08-2024 03:40 PM
-
And here is my cheesy playing over a software generated backing track:
https://mega.nz/file/yEg2yZZD#q5UTXK...Nf2SeA3qtWN-ww
-
So C7 and A7 don’t really form a ii-V because C isn’t the ii. Bb7 and A7 would be closer to the ii-V movement because that bVI7 chord is a pretty sub for V/V, particularly in a minor key. Calling it a tritone substitution for E would make sense, but it’s especially common in that I bVII7 VI7 motion you see here, going to ii. The commonly played changes to Wine and Roses and a common iteration of Dewey Square reflect that (though maybe not the originals).
2. If you replaced the one measure long Bb7 with a II-V (Fm7 Bb7, half measure each), you'd get a "logical" movement in fourths. But, unlike the original Bb7, that doesn't work, I think. I feel like it disturbs both the harmonic rhythm and the sonority of the all-dominants sequence. Also Fm7 is unusual (Berklee even disregards it sort of, together with other IIs, but I'll leave it there because you don't like Berklee LOL)
But also that bass motion I bVII VI ((then often bVI) is a super common device in old swing tunes
-
Useful insights, thanks Interesting re. bass motion and those two tunes.
In the key of C and in the key of A minor:
- G7 E7 Am(7)
- C7 A7 Dm(7)
I think those two function as minor II-V-I, don't you think?
-
-
Those last 4 bars...
ii iv / I VI7 / ii V /I
-
If the change were C to A7, it would be pretty common.
Same for C to E7. Pretty common.
Changing the C to a C7 doesn't seem like that big a deal.
The intervening Bb7 can be considered a slide into A7 from a half step up (my term for it, I don't know the correct term, if there is one).
Or, the Bb7 is a tritone sub for E7.
Is it a ii V? Do you want to consider E7 to A7 a II7 V7 in D (major or minor) - even though the tonal center is C? I think it gets the target wrong. The progression is heading for C not D-something.
-
Have you posted this because you like Dm7 Fm6 C A7 Dm7 G7 better than what I wrote? I'd like to learn why. I only chose Bb7 over Fm looking at the melody and Em7 over C to get a II-V. My knowledge is very limited.
All of Me has the exact same sequence (just one chord per measure but then again, twice as fast BPM).
To me it's one of the harmonically embellished turnarounds that sound like F C G7 C. Others do F F#dim7 C/G (Bill Bailey, The Preacher)... i.e. get from F to C differently.
-
I can see all of this. Thanks!
Do you refer to this?
I see G7 = Bm7b5, C7 = Em7b5. In fact, for half-diminished, I've been practicing a specific piano voicing that has 1, b5, b7, 11, no b3, and those notes make a nice 9.13 dominant chord if you add a bass a major third below. To be precise, bottom to top, B E F A gives you this particular flavour of Bm7b5, or of G7 if you add a G bass.
-
-
-
All I was thinking is that if the progression is C7 A7 D7 G7 C, would you want to think about C7 (bearing in mind that Em7b5 is a rootless C9) to A7 being a II V in D?
And then think of A7 to D7 as being a II V in G?
I suppose you could, but I think it might interfere with the fact that the progression resolves to C, not D or G.
-
But I've seen the A section resolve to C, B section start on C7 (suggesting an F target), then A7 Dm to form the complete two-step minor cadence (whether or not you see it as a minor II-V-I). Bye Bye Blackbird comes to mind.
It Had to Be You moves to Am (not Dm this time) in the very same way.
I really thought it's a very common form of minor II-V that's not made of two movements in fourths but that's all.
-
-
I only like it because I learned it that way, from Louis Prima's version...which is in Ab actually!
I'll take a look later or tomorrow and chart out the whole thing...Monk of course does this too, but that's a lot trickier to figure out, and I doubt you're going to be playing his solo piano version with a group.
I might have to check out DLR's version too for kicks
-
Oh, I see. Yes, his cover made the composition very popular. It's great to know that it uses those chords specifically. I've seen Dm7 Fm6 sometimes in charts (and took notice) but haven't come across recordings that back those specifically. I may change the Bb7 to a Fm6 then. I'm very curious to read what you found.
We have totally drifted from the C7 Bb7 A7 that was the subject, I hope it doesn't make the whole thing very confusing to others.
Monk's take on solo stride piano is beautiful and dramatic.
"Later or tomorrow", you don't sleep? EDIT: ha ha, I just realised we are in totally different parts of the world.
-
-
-
-
Ok, having my old fashioned, headphones on.
Louis Prima transposed to C.
C6 | C6/9 | C Ebdim7 | Dm7 G7|
Dm7 G7 | Dm7 G7 | Dm7 G7 | C6
C7 | Bb7 | A7 | Dm |
Dm7 Fm6| C6 A7 | Dm7 G7 | C
-
-
Nice Interesting re. Dm7 Fm6, diatonic third up is less common than diatonic third down. I've also seen Dm(7) Dm7b5 to achieve the same thing, but this time followed by G7. Ending of Alone Together bridge.
Oh! No, to me the Rhythm Changes bridge is a circle of dominants. A (hypothetical) II-V version of the bridge would be
Bm7b5 | E7 | Em7 | A7 |
Am7 | D7 | Dm7 | G7 ||
The second half is of course super common.
-
IIm7 = IV6 (inversion), so IIm7 to IVm6 to I is basically the same as IV to IVm to I but approached differently (but not too differently as I7 and VI7 belong to the same family of four dominants, the other two being bIII7 and #IV7 resp. bV7).
Examples for this movement are e.g. in It Could Happen To You, 'Til There Was You, Soultrane ...
-
I'll check them out, thanks
-
When an Elitist is not an Elitist
Today, 07:46 PM in For Sale